Website audit vs accessibility audit
A broad website audit and an accessibility audit are not interchangeable.
Both can identify barriers worth fixing, but they have different purposes, methods, expertise requirements, and levels of assurance.
Run a free website snapshotShort answer
A broad audit looks across website health and business journeys. A proper accessibility audit focuses deeply on disabled users, applicable standards, assistive technology, and manual conformance testing.
Broad website audit
Reviews connected signals such as performance, search foundations, trust, mobile experience, conversion clarity, and detectable accessibility warnings.
Accessibility audit
Examines conformance and real usability through manual testing, keyboard and screen-reader review, zoom and reflow, content, forms, media, and representative tasks.
Where they overlap
Both may uncover missing labels, contrast concerns, document-structure issues, slow experiences, confusing navigation, and barriers in critical journeys.
When specialist review matters
Use a qualified accessibility professional when conformance, procurement, legal risk, remediation planning, or an important user journey requires defensible depth.
Use this to decide
A useful review should answer these questions.
- ✓ Does the scope name the accessibility standard and conformance level?
- ✓ Are keyboard, screen-reader, zoom, reflow, forms, and real tasks tested manually?
- ✓ Are affected users and task severity considered?
- ✓ Are automated warnings clearly separated from confirmed failures?
- ✓ Does the report include remediation guidance and a retest process?